Publisher of Libertarian Republic: I’m a Constitutionalist/Minarchist

In his own words for an article at the Libertarian Republic  discussing his skepticism of a nonexistent libertarian orthodoxy, the publisher says the following:

I’m a constitutionalist because I believe that individuals have the right to contract with one another via democratic processes in order to decide how best to maintain civil order. I’m not necessarily for the constitution as it lies, but a constitutionalist in general. And I’m a minarchist because I believe whatever government is formed from those processes should be as small as possible, and there are areas where no government is necessary, including roads and even courts and police in many cases. (Emphasis added)

And this, my friends, is why I’m so vigilant to point out whenever someone misuses the word “libertarian.” If statement made above doesn’t bother you as a libertarian, there’s something wrong.

To make this clear immediately, this isn’t about his minarchism or belief in limited constitutions. Simply believing the government should follow the document they allegedly derive their authority from can land you on a terrorist watchlist.

But a self-described minarchist and constitutionalist who believes in the democratic process that H.L. Menken spent his career mocking should not be running a site called “Libertarian Republic.”

Ending the State, One Step At a Time

This may seem hypocritical, as I write for the Tenth Amendment Center, a constitutional think tank, and its projects. My work there is a means, not the end. While I push for the federal government’s powers to be limited to those delegated to it in the constitution, I also support all efforts to abolish the federal government and return the powers to the states. I also promote the reduction of state authority until it’s abolished as well. At the same time, I don’t vote and don’t intend to ever again.

Nor will I ever promote a certain candidate in an election. Having served as a precinct delegate for Ron Paul twice and supported his campaign in 2007 and 2012, I’ve accepted the futility of trying to create change by electing the “right” person. I’m just working with what’s given to us.

If this was the case for the publisher, I wouldn’t be complaining. But he calls himself a constitutionalist and minarchist while running a site called “Libertarian Republic.” As trivial as this may seem to some, it is a significant problem.

Libertarianism and Government Do Not Mix

Why is this important?

Because the word “libertarian” is now associated with something that has nothing to do with the philosophy, which is a stateless society. We’ve gotten to the point where a person can run a site with the word “libertarian” in it while describing themselves as something other than a libertarian, as though libertarianism was merely an offshoot of a political movement or party or fits within the confines of constitutionalism.

Again, I’m not critiquing the publisher’s belief in constitutions, per se, but the use of the word “libertarian” in its masthead when they’re in favor of limited government rather promoting the abolition of the state. Since the site does not have a mission statement, community beliefs, or guiding principals akin to those found at publications like Return of Kings, we’re left to conclude this is the purpose of the site.

To give an analogy, Lincoln was against slavery, but politically favored restricting it to the South. He did not seek to abolish it where it already was, and he supported the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850. Lysander Spooner and William Llyod Garrison, on the other hand, were abolitionists and advocated the total elimination of the institution. For Lincoln to have run a newspaper called the Abolitionist Republic while promoting his belief in restricting, rather than abolishing the institution of slavery would have given people the impression that abolitionists were only interested in restricting slavery instead of eliminating it altogether.

Likewise, people will visit Libertarian Republic and assume that libertarianism is about limited government, when it’s not. They will not learn about the NAP or how libertarianism forbids the use of coercion and aggression. They will get an impression of libertarianism that looks nothing like that described in Gerard Casey’s Libertarian Anarchy: Against the State.

For those who are concerned about intellectual purity and the preservation of meaning in words, the distinction is fundamental.

Once more, it’s not the content that irks me. It’s the way it is being packaged.

If the intellectual decline of Reason Magazine is any indication, it won’t be long before the Libertarian Republic publishes articles similar to “Libertarianism Is More Than Opposition To Force” or gives a platform for fake libertarians who advocate cultural or social values completely separate from libertarianism. Considering they have already published reviews of American Sniper describing Chris Kyle’s conduct in a positive light, I’m not optimistic.

I’m not one to judge people’s motives without evidence, so one can only speculate as to why the publisher chose to use “Libertarian Republic” as the masthead instead of “Constitutional Republic.”

Either way, to paraphrase a curiously appropriate Irish rebel song, they need to take it down from the masthead; it’s the word we anarchists claim.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Central Government, federal government, libertarianism, Slavery and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Publisher of Libertarian Republic: I’m a Constitutionalist/Minarchist

  1. mattwilson32 says:

    Question, I’ve only self described as libertarian for 2-3 years. When I first started researching libertarianism, I found tons of different types. Everything from left – libertarian to an-cap, minarchist and Libertarians. Is there only one type of true libertarian? I looked at all the descriptions and decided what I felt fell into the catagory of “minarchist”. I feel that some structure is needed to enforce things like contracts. Although I don’t feel that that structure should be able to make law, it could only be described as govt. I enjoy your writing and would appreciate your feedback

    Like

    • I’ve been a libertarian for about the same time, so I understand the confusion in trying to figure things out. Libertarianism is based on the Non-Aggression Principle, which states no one may initiate aggression or coercion against innocent people or their property. This is why it does not allow the state.

      When it comes down to arguments between a lot of libertarians and minarchists, there is often a lack of clarity about short term versus long term goals. My short term goal is minarchism but the starting point, the objective, for me is anarchism. This may seem like straining gnats, and sometimes it can be, but in the long term is dictates important political stances.

      This is why my grievance with the publisher isn’t because he states he is a minarchist or a constitutionalist. I have a problem with him using “libertarian” as the name of his site because it does not match the beliefs he is promoting on his site and this leads to unnecessary confusion over what it means to be a libertarian.

      Like

  2. mattwilson32 says:

    I guess when we start on the path of freedom, we will all get to the same place eventually. Each at our own pace.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Ron Paul Properly Defines Libertarianism | The Anarchist Notebook | Libertarian Anarchy

  4. Pingback: The Libertarian Republic That Wasn’t | The Anarchist Notebook | Libertarian Anarchy

  5. Pingback: The Man Behind the Curtain | The Anarchist Notebook | Libertarian Anarchy

  6. Pingback: You Ungrateful Libertarians! | The Anarchist Notebook | Libertarian Anarchy

  7. Pingback: Libertarian Republic Goes Full Retard | The Anarchist Notebook

  8. Pingback: The Libertarian Red Pill | The Anarchist Notebook

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s